Discover the Unmasking Grace and Wear The Mask collections ~ Unmasking Grace: The Stationery Collection That Lets Your Soul Speak!

✨ Unmasking Grace: The Stationery Collection That Lets Your Soul Speak ✨

Tired of hiding behind the mask the world expects you to wear? Discover Unmasking Grace and the companion Wear The Mask collection—artfully crafted journals, diaries, and address books that don't just hold your thoughts—they reveal who you truly are.

📝 Why This Collection Is More Than Just Stationery

• 🌟 Artful, statement-making covers – unique designs that reflect bold individuality and inner strength.
• 📖 Versatile layouts – with lined and blank pages to suit your every thought, dream, or plan.
• 🎁 A perfect gift – for birthdays, holidays, or anyone who needs a little inspiration to speak their truth.
• 👜 Compact, stylish design – fits perfectly into your bag, workspace, or nightstand.

These books aren’t just for writing—they’re for awakening. For rediscovering your voice, embracing your truth, and letting your story unfold page by page.

📚 Shop the Collection Now

Click the links below to browse and purchase your favorites from Amazon or direct listings:

• Notebook 1
• Notebook 2
• Notebook 3
• Notebook 4
• Notebook 5
• Notebook 6
• Notebook 7
• Amazon: B0D3JN5NN4
• Amazon: B0D3F7LW23
• Amazon: B0BVC8MXC3
• Amazon: B0BVDSBZMY

© 2025 Unmasking Grace Collection. All rights reserved.

Is Tulsi Gabbard the Face of the "New Bigot" in America?

Tulsi Gabbard has long defied political categorization. Once a Democratic rising star with a unique brand of anti-interventionist politics, she’s now found a home among conservative circles and MAGA influencers. But as her public persona continues to evolve, one question has started to gain traction in political discourse: Is Tulsi Gabbard the face of the “New Bigot” in America?

What Is the "New Bigot"?

The claim that Gabbard represents the “New Bigot” in American politics is, without question, a provocative and contentious accusation. However, it is not without context. The term "New Bigot" doesn’t refer to overt racism or hate speech in the traditional sense — rather, it characterizes individuals who espouse exclusionary, nationalist, or regressive policies while cloaking their positions in the language of patriotism, centrism, or anti-establishment sentiment.

Tulsi Gabbard’s trajectory — from progressive trailblazer to Fox News fixture — makes her an ideal case study for how such transformations can happen in modern American politics.

Criticisms That Align with the “New Bigot” Label

• Past Stances on LGBTQ+ Rights: Gabbard’s early political career included active involvement in her father’s anti-LGBTQ+ organization, which advocated against civil unions and same-sex marriage. While she has since apologized for those views, many LGBTQ+ activists remain skeptical, noting that her evolution coincided with a broader shift in public opinion — not necessarily a sincere personal reckoning.
• Promotion of Disinformation: Gabbard was widely criticized for repeating discredited claims about U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine — a narrative heavily promoted by Russian state media. Al Jazeera and other outlets highlighted the potential national security risks of echoing such propaganda. Prominent Republicans including Mitt Romney and former Representative Adam Kinzinger condemned her remarks, with Kinzinger calling her comments “traitorous.”
• Problematic Foreign Policy Stances: In 2017, Gabbard met with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad during a controversial “fact-finding” trip. Critics, including Senator Tammy Duckworth, questioned her judgment and motives, with Duckworth labeling her “compromised.” Assad, a known war criminal and ally of Russia and Iran, was legitimized through Gabbard’s visit — an act many Democrats and security analysts saw as dangerous and irresponsible.

Tulsi Gabbard's Response

To her credit, Gabbard has defended herself from these accusations. She clarified — most notably in a follow-up post on X (formerly Twitter) — that “biolabs” and “bioweapons labs” are not the same thing, suggesting her earlier comments were misunderstood. She has also emphasized her military service and stated that she prioritizes peace and non-interventionism over party loyalty.

Changing Political Terrain: A Power Vacuum and a Cultural Shift

Her rise coincides with a broader social realignment. White suburban women — once key swing voters — have seen their cultural capital decline amid the rollback of DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) initiatives and reproductive rights. Meanwhile, many Black women, exhausted by decades of protest without meaningful political reciprocity, are stepping back from roles as frontline defenders of American democracy.

In this climate, Gabbard fills a void: a non-white, non-male voice lending legitimacy to regressive causes, cloaked in rhetoric of patriotism and freedom. She is, for some on the right, the perfect “post-racial” messenger for policies that hurt communities of color the most.

Speculation: The Looming Reckoning

But here’s the paradox: Gabbard’s proximity to power may also make her expendable. If Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” — which slashes Medicare, guts SNAP benefits, and closes rural hospitals — begins to backfire, the MAGA machine will need someone to blame. Should the Jeffrey Epstein documents unearth new legal or moral threats to Trump’s credibility, scapegoats will be in high demand. And history tells us that in times of political desperation, those who don’t truly belong to the inner circle are often thrown under the bus.

Tulsi Gabbard, for all her service and loyalty, may one day find herself on the wrong side of the populist mob she once sought to lead.

Conclusion

Is Tulsi Gabbard the face of the New Bigot in America? That depends on how one defines bigotry in the 21st century. If it includes denying rights under the guise of freedom, amplifying authoritarian propaganda while claiming patriotism, or enabling regressive power structures behind a non-white, female face — then she is, at the very least, emblematic of this new breed.

In the end, the “New Bigot” doesn’t wear a hood. They wear a flag. And they speak not in slurs, but in soundbites.

Can You Really Change Your Personality? The Science Says Yes ~ What if the one thing holding you back… was something you could change?

Yes, You Can Change Your Personality: What Science From Kentucky Reveals

What if you could become the version of yourself you always wanted to be—confident, organized, calm under pressure? New research says: you actually can.

The Surprising Truth: Your Personality Isn’t Set in Stone

For years, most people believed personality was a fixed part of who you are. You’re either an introvert or an extrovert, messy or tidy, calm or anxious. But science now tells a different story—your personality can change, and it might just transform your entire life.

What Is Personality Science?

Personality science is the study of how we think, feel, and act. It explores what makes us unique—and whether we can tweak those traits. Researchers focus on the “Big Five” traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Understanding how these traits work gives scientists insight into how—and why—people change over time.

The Breakthrough at the University of Kentucky

Dr. Shannon Sauer-Zavala, a leading psychology researcher at the University of Kentucky, has made headlines with her powerful claim: personality change is possible. And not just over years. In as little as 12 to 20 weeks, she’s seen patients with anxiety shift into calmer, more balanced versions of themselves.

“With the right tools and support,” she says, “introverts can grow into extroverts, disorganized people can become more focused, and anxious minds can find peace.”

Real Change Starts With a Simple Test

Dr. Sauer-Zavala’s process begins with a baseline personality test. Questions like “I sometimes manipulate people into doing what I want” help people understand their emotional patterns. From there, it’s about changing those patterns step by step—adjusting thoughts, routines, and reactions.

The Power of Conscious Change

This research gives hope to anyone who’s ever felt stuck in their own skin. You don’t have to stay the same forever. Want to be more outgoing? Kinder? More patient or assertive? With small consistent changes, science says it’s within your reach.

From Weird to Wonderful: Why It Matters

Think about how often we hear, “That’s just the way I am.” But what if that isn’t true? What if your identity is more flexible than you ever imagined? The idea that we’re not trapped by our past is weirdly freeing. It opens up a world where growth isn't just possible—it’s expected.

What Does This Mean for the Future?

Imagine mental health care where changing personality traits is part of treatment. Imagine teens being taught not just math and history, but how to evolve their personalities. The implications are massive—personality change could help reduce anxiety, depression, and even improve job satisfaction and relationships.

Conclusion: The You of Tomorrow Starts Today

The science is clear: you can change. With intention, self-awareness, and the right support, your personality can grow in ways you never thought possible. So if there’s a version of yourself you dream of becoming—now’s the time to start.

Personality isn’t destiny. It’s just your starting point.

Don’t Miss Out: These Big Brand Settlement Payouts Could Put Cash, Credit, or Perks in Your Pocket

Ever felt like a company took advantage of you — overcharged you, sold you less than they promised, or mishandled your personal data? You’re not alone. Right now, millions of Americans are owed money, credits, or free perks thanks to recent class action settlements against big names like Fortnite, Criterion Channel, Neiman Marcus, and Mattress Firm.

Here’s your chance to claim what’s yours — but time is running out.

---

🎮 1. Fortnite Refunds — Up to $1,500

Deadline: July 9, 2025

The FTC is distributing part of a $126 million settlement after players were tricked into unwanted purchases or had accounts locked when disputing charges between 2017–2022 :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.

Eligible if:

• You were charged for items you didn’t buy (Jan 2017–Sept 2022)
• Your child made unauthorized purchases (Jan 2017–Nov 2018)
• Your account was locked after disputing charges

Refunds: Average ~$114, up to $1,500

👉 File Your Fortnite Claim

---

🎬 2. Criterion Channel Privacy Settlement — $4.5M

Deadline: August 19, 2025

The Criterion Channel quietly shared viewer data with third parties like Meta and Twilio without user consent, violating privacy laws. They’ve agreed to a $4.5 million settlement :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}.

Eligible if: You were a subscriber or registered user and watched recorded videos from Sept 27, 2022, to Dec 27, 2024.

👉 Submit Your Criterion Claim

---

👜 3. Neiman Marcus Data Breach — Up to $2,500 + Credit Monitoring

Claim Deadline: October 8, 2025

Neiman Marcus was hit by a May 2024 data breach. They’ve set aside $3.5 million to cover victims’ documented losses (up to $2,500) + two years of credit monitoring :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.

Eligible if: Your personal data was exposed in May 2024.

👉 File Your Neiman Marcus Claim

---

🛏️ 4. Mattress Firm “Fake Sale” Settlement — $5.48M

Deadline: August 5, 2025 (California purchases only)

Mattress Firm listed inflated “regular” prices to make discounts look bigger than they were — costing customers real money. They agreed to a $5.48 million settlement :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}.

Payments: $40 per mattress purchased (1–4 per claim)

👉 Check Your Eligibility & Claim

---

⏳ Final Warning

Many of these claims close in just hours or days. Even if the payout seems small, it's money that belongs to you — and filing a claim takes just a few minutes.

---

🎯 Your Action Plan

1. Bookmark this page.
2. Click the links for each applicable settlement.
3. File your claim before the deadline.
4. Tell your friends and family — spread the word.

Companies often rely on low visibility and busy lives to avoid payouts. Don’t let that happen. You deserve justice — and a shot at cents, credits, or perks you’ve already earned.

Tragedy in the MRI Room: The Hidden Dangers of MRI Scans and the New York Man Pulled to His Death

It happened in seconds. A 20-pound chain wrapped around his neck, and before anyone could stop it, Keith McAllister was ripped into a powerful MRI machine—right in front of his wife. The machine meant to diagnose became a deadly force no one could control.

What Are MRIs and Why Are They Considered Safe?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the most advanced tools in modern medicine. Unlike X-rays or CT scans, MRIs don’t emit harmful ionizing radiation. Instead, they use a strong magnetic field and radio waves to create detailed images of the inside of the body.

For most people, an MRI is safe and routine. But the tragic death of a New York man has revealed the terrifying power these machines can unleash if safety rules are ignored—even for a moment.

The Incident That Shook Long Island

On July 16, 2025, 61-year-old Keith McAllister accompanied his wife, Adrienne Jones-McAllister, to the Nassau Open MRI clinic in Westbury, Long Island. She was there for a simple knee scan.

While inside the MRI chamber, Adrienne called to her husband, “Keith, come help me up.” Keith entered the scanning room—wearing a heavy weight-training chain around his neck, something he had reportedly worn during previous visits without incident.

Moments later, the MRI machine’s powerful magnet yanked the chain with tremendous force, pulling Keith into the machine. He suffered multiple heart attacks from the trauma and died the following day at the hospital.

“It Snatched Him Like He Was Nothing”

Adrienne watched it happen. “He went limp in my arms,” she said, sobbing. According to a GoFundMe page set up to support her, Keith remained pinned to the machine for nearly an hour before staff could detach the chain.

Adrienne also claimed that clinic staff had seen the chain before and never raised concerns. “This was not the first time that guy [had] seen that chain,” she said. “They had a conversation about it before.”

The Powerful Magnetic Force Inside an MRI

The FDA and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) both warn that MRI machines have an intense magnetic field—strong enough to fling a wheelchair across a room. That’s why patients and anyone entering an MRI room are supposed to be carefully screened for any metallic objects.

The danger isn’t theoretical. In 2001, a six-year-old boy named Michael Colombini died in a similar incident when an oxygen tank was pulled into an MRI machine in Westchester County, New York.

Was This Preventable?

Absolutely. MRIs are considered safe—but only when operated under strict safety protocols. That means clear communication, complete object screening, and zero tolerance for shortcuts. So why was Keith allowed in with the chain? Was it complacency? Poor training? A deadly oversight?

This tragedy raises urgent questions about training, emergency protocols, and accountability at imaging centers across the country.

A Heartbreaking Reminder

Keith McAllister’s death is more than a horrifying accident—it’s a powerful reminder that advanced technology must be respected. His story makes one thing painfully clear: an MRI machine may be a medical marvel, but it's also a silent giant with the power to kill when rules are broken.

Final Thoughts

Let this be a wake-up call for patients and healthcare professionals alike. No matter how many times someone’s been in an MRI room, safety is not optional. The McAllister family’s tragedy must not be repeated.

Always remove metal before entering an MRI room. Always speak up if you’re unsure. Always prioritize safety—because it could mean the difference between life and death.

Why the GOP Shut Down Congress Over Epstein—and Why They Keep Blaming Black America When Things Get Hot

Why the GOP Shut Down Congress Over Epstein—and Why They Keep Blaming Black America

Congress suddenly shut down. One month before the federal budget deadline. Why? Because a bipartisan push to release Jeffrey Epstein's files sent GOP leaders into panic mode. And when the pressure hits, the same disturbing pattern emerges: Donald Trump and parts of the Republican Party try to deflect by blaming Black Americans. It's a page straight out of a racist American playbook—and it's playing out in real time.

What’s Really Going On?

The Epstein scandal has haunted the political world for years. But this summer, it hit a boiling point. The House was forced to reckon with bipartisan pressure to release the sealed Epstein documents—files that could expose names, actions, and connections involving the powerful and elite, including former President Donald Trump himself.

So what did Speaker Mike Johnson and the House GOP do? They shut it down. Literally. Congress was dismissed early for summer recess—weeks before the September 30 budget deadline that could trigger a government shutdown. But while the heat rises around the Epstein fallout, something even more sinister is happening: Trump is back to blaming Black people to change the subject.

The Epstein Panic on Capitol Hill

Bipartisan momentum surged around a bill demanding the release of Epstein files. Co-sponsored by Republican Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna, the bill would finally unseal records and offer the public long-awaited transparency.

GOP leadership, however, stalled. Speaker Johnson canceled floor votes, shut down the session, and dismissed lawmakers for a month. Reports from inside Republican meetings say party leaders feared what might come next—especially with Trump's name rumored to be in the files. Behind the scenes, chaos and fear reigned.

Trump’s Playbook: Blame Black America

And then came the deflection. Instead of confronting the Epstein controversy, Trump accused former President Obama of treason—without evidence, charges, or Congressional investigation. It was a baseless distraction. But it wasn’t new.

Throughout history, when the pressure builds, white America often shifts the blame toward Black Americans. Here are just a few chilling examples:

• Emmett Till (1955): A 14-year-old boy lynched in Mississippi after a white woman falsely claimed he whistled at her. She later admitted she lied.
• Hurricane Katrina (2005): Media and officials labeled Black survivors as “looters” while ignoring the government’s failure to protect and support New Orleans' Black communities.
• Modern “Karens”: Viral videos reveal countless white women falsely accusing Black people of crimes—many of which result in police involvement or worse.
• Kirk County Flooding (2024): White officials blamed flooding over 100 miles away on Austin’s Black Fire Chief, despite zero connection.

It’s not coincidence. It’s a pattern. A deeply rooted American pattern where accountability is dodged by scapegoating Black citizens.

What’s at Stake in September?

Congress is now on break until September 1. But time is ticking. The current fiscal year ends September 30, and if a new budget isn’t passed, the government will shut down.

Meanwhile, the Epstein files remain sealed—though pressure continues to build for their release. If Trump's name appears in those records, expect more distractions, more fearmongering, and, sadly, more attempts to blame Black leaders for crises they didn’t create.

Is This the America We Want?

Let’s be honest. The Epstein files are not just about individual names. They are about powerful systems that protect predators, silence victims, and spin lies to preserve the status quo.

Instead of facing hard truths, the GOP chose silence. Instead of accountability, they offer blame. And when pushed into a corner, Trump’s playbook is to yell "look over there!"—usually toward a Black public figure, community, or symbol.

Conclusion

When the GOP shut down Congress early, they didn’t just delay votes. They delayed justice. They ducked responsibility. And they reminded the country how racial scapegoating is still alive and weaponized.

We deserve the truth. We deserve leaders who don’t run from facts. And we deserve better than another political trick at the expense of Black Americans.

Final Thought

The big question remains: What are they so afraid of in those Epstein files? And how long will they keep deflecting before the truth finally comes out?